The adaptation of a proposal regarding the debts relaxation in Texas has been opposed for various reasons. People are there who feels that the proposal for the amendment of Section 52-a, Article III, Texas Constitution is going to be a failure. They believe that by adopting the proposed amendment there are chances that might lead to the process of undermining the constitutional protections for taxpayers. This is in regards to the creation of public debt in a very convenient and smooth manner. The oppositions are however logical in their own way. They are meant to be the ultimate ways of checking out the proposal. The people who are in concern thinks that if under any circumstance the constitution is amended and there remains no chance to provide any long-term economic development agreement that is not secured by a pledge of ad valorem taxes. There are also sequence that stands for the safeguarding processes for the section that has been financed by the issuance of bonds that does not create debt. There are assumptions that state that the future governing bodies may be bound by agreements that were entered into without the constitutional requirements. This is purely in regards to the issuance of debt. It is of great concern and the people who are opposing the proposal believe it to be unnecessary to take the step of amending the state constitution. They are also of the idea that to address concerns rose by a single lower-court case needs more time to get some speculations. According to a source led by David Disiere , the recent district court ruling the concern of an agreement under Chapter 380, Local Government Code, created an “unconstitutional debt” applies only to the narrow circumstances of that case, which is again a subject to appeal